* SACRED DOCTRINE OF THE STATE AND STATESMANSHIP * https://thechapelofgrace.com/biblical-conception-of-the-state-2.php TWO DOCTRINES OF THE STATE There are two political doctrines of the State and Statesmanship – an EVIL cruel DOCTRINE of Force with Intrigues, and the SACRED caring DOCTRINE of Justice with Integrity. Pro 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people. Pro 29:2 When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked bears rule, the people mourn. THREE FORMS OF THE STATE OR GOVERNMENTS FOUND AMONG THE NATIONS State or government authority, despite its various forms, is instituted by God for orderly governance in any human community of any extent, therefore every political office is divine ministry for good and justice. _“ T he authorities that exist have been INSTITUTED BY GOD. ”_ (Rom 13:1) _“ For he is the MINISTER OF GOD to you for good ”_...
THE CONTROVERSY ABOUT ORIGINS: Intelligent Design versus Unguided Evolution By Very Rev Dr. Ifechukwu U. Ibeme Abstract The debate between Intelligent Design (ID) and unguided evolution is a profound clash of worldviews on the origins of the universe and life’s complexity. Both interpret the same empirical data —fossils, genetics, cosmic constants— through distinct philosophical lenses: NATURALISTIC PROBABILITY, emphasizing chance and chaos, versus PROVIDENTIAL PURPOSEFULNESS, inferring intentional design. This paper synthesizes key themes from extended dialogue: logical merits, data interpretations, frameworks, theory-laden observations, starting premises, and critiques of mechanisms like the multiverse. It argues that the controversy hinges not on facts but on permissible causes— chaos versus God —while noting that "modern empirical science’s methodological naturalism fosters dialogue with metaphysical frameworks unless polemics interferes.” Notably, the human c...
Abstract The scourge of racial and tribal pride and prejudice persists globally, manifesting as one of humanity’s most enduring moral failings. Yet, the contemporary “history-blame” strategy—assigning perpetual guilt and stoking resentment over ancestral wrongs—stands as the most counterproductive and divisive response ever advanced in the pursuit of justice. Far from fostering unity, it perpetuates cycles of hatred, polarization, and political exploitation. This essay contends that genuine progress demands moral persuasion rooted in philosophical reason, religious truth, and personal repentance, as demonstrated by the Christian-inspired abolitionist movements of the 18th and 19th centuries. By contrasting the futility of rage-driven ideologies with the transformative power of humility and reconciliation, it calls for a spiritual and ethical revival to heal divisions, urging societies to prioritize heart-change over historical vendettas for lasting peace. Introduction In our fractured ...
Comments